CASE #: 65111-1-IA.G., D.F. and J.J., Res. v. Corp. of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, et al., Apps.
King County, Cause No. 08-2-02340-1 SEA
Counsel:Enclosed is a copy of the opinion filed in the above-referenced appeal which states in part: “We affirm.”
Excerpt: APPELWICK, J. — After settling these cases, the Archdiocese filed a motion to enforce the return or destruction of certain discovery documents, in accordance with a stipulated protective order the parties had signed. The trial court denied the Archdiocese’s motion and instead modified the protective order to allow opposing counsel, Pfau Cochran, to retain the documents because they were the subject of ongoing discovery disputes in other cases. The question of whether the documents could be used in those cases was expressly left to the discretion of the judges in those other cases. We find no abuse of discretion. We affirm.
Read the full text: 2011-04-25 — Court of Appeals 65111-1-I A.G., D.F. and J.J., Res. v. Corp. of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, et al. Apps.
